The CNO cycle increases the abundance of nitrogen and this can reveal itself in enhanced surface nitrogen even on the main sequence.Įven more massive stars can lose large fractions of their mass towards the ends of their lives revealing the outcome of previous nuclear burning. Firstly, they burn hydrogen via the CNO catalytic cycle and they have radiative envelopes with little convection. However, they behave in a more complex way during their shorter lives. More massive stars do not live for 10 billion years. It is unlikely that would change, because iron is not produced in such stars. There are also giant stars that show enhanced carbon or oxygen abundances. Famously this has included objects where technetium has been detected - this has a short half-life so demonstrates it must have been made inside the star - and also objects like "barium giants" - again, rich in heavy elements produced in the s-process. Thus asymptotic giant stars can be observed with all sorts of "chemical anomalies". The heavier elements are produced by "slow" neutron capture (aka the s-process). If you pick a star that is a little more massive, maybe 1.1 solar masses such that it has reached the asymptotic giant branch after its main sequence and red giant phases, then carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and a variety of much heavier elements are being produced in the interior and mixed to the surface by convection. There is a tendency for the heavier elements it was born with to sink with age, but this is stymied by the outer convective layer that stops this diffusion from occurring, other than to increase the surface helium abundance a little. It will be on the main sequence, fusing hydrogen to helium via the pp chain, which does not change the abundance of metals. If the star is a solar mass or below it will not produce any metals (anything heavier than helium) within 10 billion years of birth.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |